Since I’ve recently been having lots of issues with Atlassian’s SourceTree for Windows, and have never particularly cared for the UI. I’ve also found Github Desktop to be very nice, but a bit limited when it comes to repositories with lots of local branches (not a common use-case on Github repositories, but I encounter it a lot at work.) I hear that SourceTree on mac is excellent, but I’ve not had the same experience with their Windows client. This is just a trivial GitKraken support question. I’ve been in the market for a Git client that was as useful and intuitive as HG Workbench for quite a while now. ATTACH After this, on the GitHub desktop, I still see those Unity Git - Ignore. Where SmartGit has a very simplified UI, GitKraken has a beautifully designed interface that offers a bit more feature-wise at the ready. I’ve been actually quite pleased so far and wanted to share my thoughts on it! As a result, when I heard about GitKraken I was eager to give it a try. GitKraken is another proprietary GUI tool that makes working with both Git and GitHub an experience you won’t regret. Their advertising is really quite ridiculous. It almost turned me off to the product at first. But most of it is about how excellent their UX is, and after a few weeks of using it, I actually have to agree.
#Gitkraken vs github desktop software
I haven’t used software which pleasantly surprised me by having completely unexpected features that “just worked” in quite a while. The last application I can remember that made me feel like this was Slack. When your product is being favorably compared to Slack, that’s usually a good sign. There are lots of little nice features such as the convenient, and most importantly – short, first-time demo that takes you around the settings menu to set up Github integration etc.
0 kommentar(er)
